Vehicle ‘kill switch’ requirement reportedly hidden in infrastructure bill. “According to an article written by former U.S. Representative Bob Barr, hidden away in the recently passed infrastructure bill… is a measure to install vehicle kill switches into every new car, truck, and SUV sold in this country…. Barr points out that the bill, which has been signed into law by President Biden, states that the kill switch, which is referred to as a safety device, must ‘passively monitor the performance of a driver of a motor vehicle to accurately identify whether that driver may be impaired’. In other words, Big Brother will constantly be monitoring how you drive. If you do something the system has been programmed to recognize as driver impairment, your car could just shut off…. This kill switch ‘safety’ system would be open, or in other words there would be a backdoor. That would allow police or other government authorities to access it whenever. Would they need a warrant to do that? Likely not. Even better, hackers could access the backdoor and shut down your vehicle.” https://www.motorious.com/articles/features-3/kill-switches-new-cars/ [UPDATE: Fact-checking groups claim there is no ‘backdoor kill-switch’ requirement to allow law enforcement agencies to stop moving vehicles. “Section 24220 of the infrastructure law mandated that within three years, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration must create new technology to regulate drunk and impaired driving. PolitiFact found no mention in the bill of a ‘kill switch’…. If the driver’s blood alcohol level is above the legal level of 0.08%, the car will turn on but won’t move.” https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/dec/05/instagram-posts/-vehicle-technology-coming-stop-impaired-drivers-i/]
Change in Dept. of Housing and Urban Development rules allowed federal disaster aid for wealthy homeowners.. “The payments, first reported by E&E News, came after a little-noticed change to department regulations in 2013 allowed states to reimburse wealthy homeowners for home repairs. The change marked a significant policy shift in the only disaster program created to help low-income people. Though that change was limited to [Hurricane] Sandy aid, HUD has since given other states similar flexibility after major disasters. The owner of one $5.5 million waterfront home on Nearwater Lane in Darien, Conn., with five bedrooms and a swimming pool, received $150,000. Another owner sold their home for $2.6 million after taking a $150,000 grant. Twelve of the 62 homes [that qualified for disaster aid] are worth more than $2 million, according to E&E News’ analysis of local assessors’ records. ‘It really stinks,’ said former HUD analyst Carlos Martín, a Brookings Institution fellow and a leading expert on disaster aid. ‘That’s not who the disaster recovery program is intended to serve.'” https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/27/connecticut-hurricane-sandy-recovery-00074134 “After the devastation caused by Hurricane Sandy in 2012, Congress apportioned over $50 billion for disaster relief. Among that total was $16 billion for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)’s Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery program (CDBG-DR). The state of Connecticut received $159 million. CDBG-DR is intended primarily to help people with lower incomes respond to disasters. But a new Politico investigation reveals that as low-income areas in Connecticut remained in disrepair after the storm, generous reimbursements and low-interest loans went to wealthy homeowners who, on paper, should not have even qualified.” https://reason.com/2022/12/29/wealthy-connecticut-residents-received-millions-in-federal-dollars-after-hurricane-sandy/
New York City’s mayor: ‘Big Brother is protecting you’. “‘It blows my mind how much we have not embraced technology, and part of that is because many of our electeds are afraid. Anything technology they think, “Oh it’s a boogeyman. It’s Big Brother watching you,” [Mayor Eric] Adams said. ‘No, Big Brother is protecting you.’ …. Controversy over decades of surveillance [of activists] led to litigation and the 1985 Handschu Guidelines, which created a mixed panel of civilians and police to oversee future surveillance. In the post-9/11 period, those guidelines were relaxed as much mass surveillance focused on Muslims, coming to an end (supposedly) only in 2014 with the resolution of a lawsuit against the city. Still, in 2016, Senior United States District Judge Charles S. Haight Jr. disapproved the settlement in the case pending stronger safeguards after the revelation of ‘repeated, near-systemic violations by the NYPD Intelligence Bureau of a pertinent Handschu Guideline.'” https://reason.com/2022/12/30/new-york-city-mayor-eric-adams-wants-you-to-love-big-brother/
Man charged with murdering four college students is a PhD criminal justice graduate student and graduate teaching assistant. “DNA evidence played a key role in identifying Bryan Christopher Kohberger as a suspect in the killings, and officials were able to match his DNA to genetic material recovered during the investigation, a law enforcement official said…. Moscow [Idaho] Police Chief James Fry said Kohberger attends Washington State University, which is only a few miles across the state line from Moscow.” https://news.yahoo.com/suspect-deaths-idaho-students-arrested-164721546.html Few details have been released. My guess is that the murders were the result of an online or in-person diss. Could this guy be the mysterious stalker?
Donald Trump claims his tax returns show his use of tax deductions to ‘create jobs’. “A [House Ways and Means] committee report released earlier in December showed Trump declared negative income in 2015-17 and in 2020, and he paid $750 in income taxes each year for 2016 and 2017, then $999,466 for 2018, $133,445 for 2019 and zero for 2020. The former president released a statement on his Truth Social account, saying the returns show how successful he’s been and how he used tax deductions to create jobs, structures and enterprises.” https://www.cnet.com/news/politics/trump-tax-returns-released-online-via-ways-and-means-committee/
January 6th committee transcripts reveal reasons given for delayed riot response. “Testimony from Maj. Gen. William J. Walker, who was the commander of the D.C. Guard, reiterated that the response from the Guard on Jan. 6 had been delayed because of concerns from higher-ups over ‘the optics’ of the army’s involvement. The reason it took three hours and 19 minutes to get approval for the Guard to help protect the Capitol, he said, was that ‘somebody or somebodies were willfully, deliberately delaying making the decision.’ He added, ‘I think it would have been a vastly different response if those were African Americans trying to breach the Capitol.’ He went on to say that the secretary of the Army, Ryan D. McCarthy, who could have approved sending Guard members to the Capitol, had become inaccessible in the days leading up to Jan. 6 and during the riot, describing how someone had been running around the Pentagon in search of him…. Steven A. Sund, the former chief of the Capitol Police, who previously said the events of Jan. 6 could not have been predicted, told investigators that the riot was a ‘colossal intelligence failure’. He said analysts in the intelligence wing of the Capitol Police had not emphasized the severity of the threat they were finding, including messages and social media posts from rioters before Jan. 6 that said ‘we will storm the government buildings, kill cops, kill security guards, kill federal employees and agents’; ‘start marching into the chambers’; and ‘show up with guns and threaten them with death’.” https://news.yahoo.com/jan-6-transcripts-detail-failures-130601895.html “The [District of.Columbia’s] mayor told lawmakers investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack [on the Capitol] that Capitol Police were unprepared for the violent assault because of a mistaken belief that [Trump supporters] would not harm them. ‘People thought they were friendly to law enforcement and that they loved their country,’ Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) said in her January 2022 interview with the House committee, a transcript of which was released Thursday. She said, however, earlier D.C. rallies of ‘white nationalist groups … showed us that they were antagonistic to law enforcement.’ …. Steven Sund, the chief of Capitol Police at the time of the breach, told the committee his request in advance of Jan. 6 for National Guard support was denied.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2022/12/29/bowser-contee-jan6-transcripts/ Well, that’s odd, because the previous story says Sund claimed the riot ‘could not have been predicted’ and was the result of an ‘intelligence failure’, but in the second story we have him requesting National Guard troops before the riot! And what if antifa had been plotting to take over the Capitol, threaten legislators and overturn the results of the election, after holding a big, publicly announced rally in D.C., where their supporters from around the country were openly planning to gather? Would the Capitol Police have been on alert? Would the response have been any different? Would deployment of the National Guard have been delayed 3 hours?